<img alt="" src="https://secure.lote1otto.com/219869.png" style="display:none;">
Skip to content

Real World Evidence Confidence

RWE_Confidence_wordmark_blue

Building Confidence Through Innovation

Ongoing discourse and deliberation among healthcare stakeholders include the crucial topic of reliability of real-world evidence (RWE). One of the key challenges in conducting RWE studies is ensuring that high-quality and fit-for-purpose data is used. Despite the recent advent of high-quality real-world data (RWD), potential issues, such as incomplete or missing data, and unmeasured or obscure confounding factors can lead to bias, jeopardizing the credibility of RWE findings. Hence, it is critical to adopt appropriate study designs, analytical methods, and statistical approaches that account for possible sources of bias and confounding. Furthermore, establishing standardized protocols for assessing and reporting data quality in RWE studies is crucial for ensuring the dependability of the results.

Find Out More

Increase RWE Confidence with Cytel’s RWE Clinical Trial Solutions.

Inform more effective and efficient healthcare decision-making through our combined innovative data-finding solutions and advanced analytic techniques.

data_finding

Data Finding

Access a depository of over 100 global database, including exclusive access to unique RWD in several countries, that provide health information of several billion patient years. Using proprietary methodology, our experts select fit-for-purpose RWD, tailored to the objectives and the planned geographical scope of your RWE study. This approach can improve study validity, provide better insights, increase efficiency, and improve the likelihood of regulatory acceptance.
comparative_effectiveness

Comparative effectiveness studies/target trial emulation (TTE)

Using rigorous methodologies on fit-for-purpose real-world data, such as TTE, comprehensive and strong evidence packages can be produced to support the drug price negotiation process. The TTE framework was also recently endorsed in NICE’s RWE framework*. Cytel RWE experts are engaged in ongoing collaborations, demonstrating the use of TTE to inform comparative effectiveness and illustrating practical considerations. Furthermore, we have published a significant number of studies and peer-reviewed articles that serve as evidence of our extensive knowledge and expertise pertaining to these concepts.

Talk to an Expert
ECAs

External Control Arms (ECAs)

Cytel has extensive experience in working with study sponsors on the strategic design and execution of ECAs for regulatory and reimbursement submissions.  Our experts have continuously contributed to topics pertaining to external controls, including peer-reviewed work on external comparators. We excel in sourcing, matching, and processing data to optimize the external control design and deliver valuable insights necessary for your success.

 

QBA

Quantitative Bias Analysis (QBA)

We are pioneers in the development and practical application of QBA methodologies to assess the robustness of RWE studies. Our publications effectively demonstrate the substantial value and practical advantages of QBA. As a testament to this, one of our recent publications was specifically cited in NICE's RWE framework as an example of QBA application for future researchers to consider. Beyond existing methods, Cytel is engaged in the development and empirical application of novel QBA approaches, such as bias adjustment using external information on bias.

Find Out More
Transportability

Transportability methods

Cytel experts are actively engaged in the application of transportability methods to facilitate stakeholder discussions and address the critical issue of generalizability and transferability of RWE across different settings and geographies. These methods broadly rely on matching and weighting approaches, outcome regressions, or a combination of both to adjust for differences in characteristics of the study population and the target population of interest. Strong assumptions for the transportability of evidence are validated based on domain proficiency, leveraging Cytel’s network of clinical experts in key geographies and ex-payers or regulators. 

PASS

PASS studies

Spontaneous reporting and registries often underreport adverse events and only observe selected patient populations. Population-based database studies on safety are a better instrument for covering these kinds of evidence needs. Our specialized team of global experts have extensive experience with claims and registry databases, ensuring the validity and quality of your product’s safety data, including a proper validation of the reported outcomes.

 

Talk to an Expert

Resources

Sorry no results please clear the filters and try again

Reflections on the RCT DUPLICATE Study and Increasing Confidence in Real-World Evidence

With input by Alind Gupta, Louis Dron, and Jason Simeone. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have long been considered..
Read more

Head-to-head comparison: a target trial emulation using real-world data

FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer
Read more

ISPE-Endorsed Guidance in Using Electronic Health Records

Comparative Effectiveness Research in COVID-19: Opportunities and Trade-Offs
Read more

Data Challenges (and Solutions) for Externally Controlled Trials

A break down of data challenges for externally controlled trials and solutions to minimize them.
Read more

Using Quantitative Bias Analysis in Real World Data Strategy

The gold standard for assessing the efficacy for a medicine continues to be RCTs, however, for many reasons (disease..
Read more

Make better decisions using innovative comparative effectiveness methods

Cytel’s expertise series: 4-part webinar series which will introduce novel comparative effectiveness methods and..
Read more