GET A FREE TRIAL

Download a fully functional 30-day trial version of either StatXact® - the most widely used exact statistics software or LogXact® for small-sample logistic regression.

Cytel Statistical Software

StatXact® Examples

Does Type of Reward Influence Reaction to Task Disruption?

Pearson Chi-Squared Test Says NO
But Exact Test Says YES

Researchers provided four types of rewards for successful completion of a block building task. The rewards may be categorized as achievement oriented, financial, socially reinforcing, and neural. Five subjects were assigned at random to each reward category. The subjects were instructed in advance about their respective reward structures, and then assigned to the block building task. Each subject was interrupted in a standard way while carrying out the task. The object of the experiment was to determine if the type of reward was related to the subject's reaction to task disruption. The data are displayed below:

 
 Reaction To Task Disruption
 Totals

Type Of  Reward

Start Over Abandon Task Modify Task  (N = 20)
 Achievement Oriented 0 0 5
 Financial 2 1 2 5
 Socially Reinforcing 2 0 3 5
 Neutral 0 1  4 5
 TOTALS 9 2  9 20

The output from StatXact for Pearson's X2 test is displayed below:

tn_sx2 Magnify_small

Notice that the Pearson X2 = 11.56, which, when referred to a chi squared distribution with 6 degrees of freedom, yields an asymptotic p-value of 0.0727. But with data this sparse can you really trust the asymptotic p-value? Fortunately you don't need to. The exact p-value of the Pearson test is computed by StatXact to be 0.0398. You can feel secure that your experiment did indeed yield a statistically significant outcome, despite the small sample size. The type of reward does indeed affect one's reaction to task disruption.

Try it yourself!
Download the data (StatXact format)
View the StatXact output (text format)

StatXact Example Library

  1. New-Born Behavior Level Study: Friedman Rank Aligned Test
  2. Histological Data: Test for Correlation in Correlated Categorical Data
  3. Teratology Study: Test for trend in Correlated data
  4. Neurotoxicity Study: Test of Trend in Multiple Endpoints Correlated Data
  5. Meta Analysis with StatXact
  6. Does Type of Reward Influence Reaction to Task Disruption?
  7. FDA Animal Toxicology Data Yields Sky-Scraper Distribution for Stratified Trend Test
  8. Minority Discrimination: An Analysis of Ill-Conditioned Data
  9. Leukemia Deaths Among Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Survivors
  10. Cochran-Armitage Exact Test of Trend for Imbalanced Data
  11. Adverse Reactions in Children Infected with Varicella
  12. Comparison of Five Modes of Therapy for the Treatment of Depression
  13. Did Entrance Exam for Firefighters Discriminate Against Minorities?
  14. StatXact Shows Small Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes to be Statistically Significant
  15. Do Five Different Chemotherapy Methods Differ Significantly in Treatment Response?
  16. Do Birds with More Immaculate Plumage Frequent the Best Feeding Sites?
  17. How Accurately do Pregnant Women Report Whether They Smoke?
  18. Do Older Employees Get Poorer Job Ratings?
  19. StatXact & LogXact: Is the New Analgesic More Effective than Aspirin?
terms and conditions | privacy policy | ©2008 Cytel Incorporated | 617.661.2011 | webmaster@cytel.com